Thrash >>> Mangle

Reesi	wysłany: 14 lat temu Important Edit: Sooooooo, it turns out I just suck at napkin math. http://theincbear.com/4-2-announced-bear-changes/ After in-depth calculations and investigation, it turns out nothing actually changed in terms of what buttons we push. If anything, pushing Pulverize doesn't suck as much. And that's pretty much it. For single target, should these patchnotes go live. Is this intentional? At 14k AP, which is not hard to come by, by any standards, Thrash is a better GCD to push than Mangle. Our priority, which is centered around Berserk procing and pushing Mangle at every opportunity, suddenly becomes "Yeah, go ahead and mangle, but if THRASH is around, forget about Mangle!" To be quite honest, that kind of defeats the purpose of having an iconic ability and a talent that allows more frequent use. New Numbers, using my current gear and all available raid buffs(and Mew.Bear): Mangle - Average damage: 20089.5499 Average threat: 60270.14235 Thrash - Direct Damage Average damage: 11398.4984 Average threat: 34196.97192 DoT (Per Tick) Average damage: 3433.23402 Average threat: 10299.70205 Total Average Threat: 65096.07807 Old Numbers - Mangle - Average damage: 23690.4023 Average threat: 71072.6758 Thrash - Direct Damage Average damage: 12911.9259 Average threat: 38737.24746 DoT (Per Tick) Average damage: 2818.93416 Average threat: 8456.80248 Total Average Threat: 64107.6549 Mangle went from a 5k threat lead to a 5k threat deficit. Again, is this intentional?
Kaivax	wysłany: 14 lat temu There is currently a bug causing Thrash to do more damage than Mangle on single targets. We don’t want Feral tanks to ignore Mangle. This should be corrected in a future PTR build. Even with the recent changes, tank threat and damage will all be reasonably close in 4.2. We like the design result where different kinds of tanks do things differently, as long as that doesn't greatly impact balance. However “high dps tank” isn’t what we're aiming for. That has too much balance risk when berserk timers are tight.
Daxxarri	wysłany: 14 lat temu 05/26/2011 06:51 PMPosted by Katjia This statement seems confusing or oddly worded or I'm just not reading it right. he got his less and more mixed up It was just a typo.