WoWCenter.pl
wikass zabił Mythrax the Unraveler (Normal Uldir) po raz 2.     
kuturin zdobył 7th Legionnaire's Cuffs.     
Nikandra spełnił kryterium Loot 200,000 gold osiągnięcia Got My Mind On My Money.     
Tooly zdobył Fairweather Helm.     
Muattin zdobył osiągnięcie The Dirty Five.     
Yoozku zdobył Parrotfeather Cloak.     
Mlody89 zdobył Royal Apothecary Drape.     
Weakness zabił Dazar, The First King (Mythic King's Rest) po raz 6.     
liq spełnił kryterium osiągnięcia Saving for a Rainy Day.     
Osiol spełnił kryterium osiągnięcia Saving for a Rainy Day.     
Wuntu zabił Zek'voz, Herald of N'zoth (Heroic Uldir) po raz 1.     
Olsa zabił Vectis (Heroic Uldir) po raz 6.     
Sarenus spełnił kryterium osiągnięcia Saving for a Rainy Day.     
kajtasus zdobył osiągnięcie Come Sail Away.     
ossir spełnił kryterium osiągnięcia Saving for a Rainy Day.     
mcpablo spełnił kryterium Alliance players slain. osiągnięcia Frontline Slayer.     
Emmm zabił Taloc (Heroic Uldir) po raz 17.     
AsaGorth spełnił kryterium Big-Mouth Clam osiągnięcia The Oceanographer.     

Ghagath

Seriously, blizzard fanboys and blizzard them self should be happy people complain, it shows they care, and it's, in a way a attempt to get things changed more to their linking.

Yes i know some of you are disgusted that people have the nerve to question blizzard and their godly ways. But to be honest there is only two types of customers, those that complain in a attempt to better their service. Then there is those that keep silent, if things do not meet their needs they simply leave.

I would rather have a customer complain, as long as that complaint is constructive rather than malicious, it helps improve the service you offer.

Also i have another tip i would like to offer you folks when it comes to arguing a point with another person. It's best not to get insulting and snide and sarcastic, simply because even if you are right, people aren't really inclined to listen to someone that has treated them as a d-bag.

The best way to change someones mind and see your point of view is to keep calm and not insult them, that way they are more willing to see your point of view.

But this does not always work here on the internet, you can intentionally write the wrong word and instantly alienate someone for a while thread or more.

For example i recently made a thread and i accidentally used the word force, as in force someone to do something. Because of this the entire point of the thread was lost and lots of people were hostile and fixated on it. Your ideas and conversation can be as well intended as possible, yet still manage to insult people.

Take for example my thread title, i just noticed it will most likely enrage some people before they even read the thread, and they will carry that emotion into their comments no madder how well intention i mean this to be.
I was thinking about a thread i was reading yesterday or the day before, someone was complaining his gm was abusing his guild by pocketing the gold they earn. This got me wondering what is the legitimate, intended use for this gold?

The only few things i can think of is, bank slots, repairs, and possibly loaning some to a member so they can work a profession. Anything i can think of other than that would not benefit the guild really.

So to prevent this type of abuse by guild GMs, could blizzard not just tweak the perk so the gold gets funneled into a repair and bank tab type account where it can not be withdraw? Perhaps instead of this perk generating gold it generates a guild type currency where you can purchase build guild repairs for your guild to use, and other guild things.

What tweak would you make, that prevents this kind of exploitation and abuse from a guild gm? Hell do it right and it might even raise the worth of guilds in a way, if they can make it so guilds can not be exploited in this way, the deadbeat GMs might not create guilds.

EDIT: Alright, can we all agree that blizzard intended that gold to be used to enrich your guild, not to turn your GM into a pimp that snatches gold and uses it as they see fit?

It doesn't matter what technical interpretations you have made out of it, that was the intended use for the gold. I doubt when they made the guild perk that gives you gold, i doubt they intended people make guilds so they can leech free gold from people.

If the Gm is using the gold as intended, fine, but not all GMs are doing that, also i can't believe i have to even type this, i'm sure you all understood this going in, unless you're trolling.