Essentially you get to become a MVP on the board if you sheepidly follow blizzs word as if mana from heaven and dont ask questions about the all powerful Blizzard of Oz.
The suck up gets the rewards while those who actually suggest ways to improve a game instead of saying its all great(albeit not in the best possibly way)
wysłany:
|
|
wysłany:
Essentially you get to become a MVP on the board if you sheepidly follow blizzs word as if mana from heaven and dont ask questions about the all powerful Blizzard of Oz. What gives you this impression? I'd honestly like to know if there's a way we can better combat this, because everything we've ever said since the program was founded is to the contrary. And, while I'm sure you don't follow everything everyone with green or blue text says or does, I've had plenty of situations in the last four years I've been a community manager where MVPs have questioned, if not openly disagreed with, my statements. Several of these players are still MVPs and we share a great deal of mutual respect for each other. They might even come in here to tell you that (once I crack the whip and call the dogs). |
|
wysłany:
I like how this thread got derailed from being negative to becoming a lovely biography about each of our greenys. Who said it was unintentional? I do this for a living, dwarf dude. :D |
|
wysłany:
One piece of evidence towards the OP's argument is that I've never seen a green start a thread that is critical of the game or its developers. Having greens occasionally disagree with a blue in a thread is somewhat nice, but it hardly matters. Practical beat me to finding the evidence. ;) |
|
wysłany:
The MVP program has grown and changed a lot since you were a part of it. Sure, there are times where I'll reach out to an MVP privately if they seem to be overly bitter or angry about something. But I don't like the concept of employees trying to micromanage the tone and language of MVPs on a regular basis. The way you naturally post on the forums over a period of time either makes you a good fit for MVP, or it doesn't. |
|
wysłany:
There are about 30 North American MVPs total. I WANT MORE. |
|
wysłany:
But doesn't the fact that every conversation that starts about the MVPs or even involves the MVPs, turns into a discussion about the merits of the MVP program suggest that MAYBE it's counterproductive? I wouldn't dare suggest most threads that receive MVP responses devolve into discussions about the merits of the program, much less every thread. What I do see quite often, however, are players who won't believe anything until they hear it "from Blizzard's mouth." The MVP program addresses this in a way. It gives us a means of officially recognizing helpful posters, which in turn tend to get more recognition from skeptical players. It's almost as though we've given a stamp of approval on a player's posts for all to see. Based on my history with the program and as a community manager, I'm confident in stating it's been very successful. This is why we want it to grow as our websites and game platforms become increasingly social and community-driven. |
|
wysłany:
No. I don't care how many achievement points an MVP has. I don't care if they just started playing WoW during Cataclysm. I care about getting reasonable, well-written feedback that I can turn into a question for an upcoming developer meeting. I care about MVPs pointing out topics I may not be aware of when I first get here in the morning that might garner a lot of attention. In all the time I've overseen the MVP program, I can't think of a single email I've received that was specifically about the performance of a single class -- a call for buffs or nerfs. The reason is because MVPs know those types of issues should be discussed on the forums. Their direct line of contact with us is primarily for emergency issues, points of clarification, etc. They're not given greater power to shape gameplay than the average player, though they have the potential to have a bigger influence on the community. That's the point. |
|
wysłany:
I like this. On a basic but fundamental level, this is why MVPs exist. |
|
wysłany:
What about if there is a legitimate complaint in that regard that an MVP feels should be brought to the devs' attention? Obviously making a thread about it (if there isn't already a good one) is mandatory, but would it be out of line to then bring that thread to your attention to ensure that the discussion that occurs therein is noticed by the proper people? No, it's not out of line, but then there's no guarantee we'd react to their thread any differently than we would any other thread on the forums. As was mentioned in this thread, there are no official roles for each MVP. So while Lissanna was chosen for being awesome and helpful within the druid community, she's not the druid representative, nor is she expected to report to us the climate within that community. She was chosen to keep doing what she's been doing and contact us if she has any questions/concerns about the community and/or her role in it. She was chosen to show other players Blizzard believes what she has to say on the forums is, more often than not, worth their while to read. |
|
wysłany:
Well, we need to sign Anonymous Post #52 up then! We don't have a hard limit on how many MVPs we want. We want to recognize as many people as possible who are helpful, 'cause there are a lot of you out there. It's just a matter of the logistics of pulling more people into the program. That takes a fair amount of time and research on our end.
I didn't really mean it like that. We have all kinds of internal alert structures. I was referring to more community-oriented, subjective issues where discussion between the community team and MVPs can be very useful. They might bring to our attention an article making its rounds on the Internet that has a lot of misinformation in it. Via email we can be a little more candid with them so they know how to approach discussions of the subject on the forums, if at all. There are times where the forums are dominated by a single topic and we really need to step back, speak with other teams at Blizzard, and decide how to approach the topic. It's during times like that where having all CMs looped into a distribution list which includes all MVPs can be extremely helpful. This stuff is all very nitty gritty and difficult to explain, so I'd prefer to leave it at that. I back what the other MVPs in this thread have said though about the benefits of this program existing. They get to see first-hand why it's useful to have a collection of friendly, constructive forum regulars in contact with the community team and be given additional recognition on the forums. |
